Current Methods of Newborn Screening Follow-Up for Sickle Cell Disease Are Highly Variable and without Quality Assurance: Results from the ENHANCE Study

Abstract

by Najibah Galadanci,Shannon Phillips,Alyssa Schlenz,Nataliya Ivankova andJulie Kanter
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2024, 10(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10010022 - 8 july 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1786
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) for sickle cell disease (SCD) has significantly improved childhood survival but there are still gaps resulting in delayed care for affected infants. As a state-run program, there are no national quality assurance programs to ensure each state achieves consistent, reliable outcomes. We performed this qualitative study of NBS follow-up practices to better evaluate and understand the multi-level, state-specific processes of how each state’s public health department delivers the NBS results to families, how/if they ensure affected infants are seen quickly by sickle cell specialists, and to determine the close-out processes used in each state. This project used semi-structured interviews conducted with 29 participants across eight states to explore these NBS follow-up processes in each state. Participants included SCD providers, NBS coordinators, or personnel associated with state health departments and community-based SCD organizations (CBO). Our results show significant state-dependent variations in the NBS processes of information delivery and patient management. Specifically, programs differed in how they communicated results to affected families and which other organizations were informed of the diagnosis. There was also state-based (and intrastate) variation in who should assume responsibility for ensuring that infants receive confirmatory testing and are promptly started on penicillin prophylaxis. Case closure was also highly variable and poorly validated. Our results also yielded identifiable challenges and facilitators to NBS which were highly variable by state but potentially addressable in the future. This information suggests opportunities for systematic improvement in NBS follow-up processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Lifespan Approach to Health and Well-Being Leveraging Neonatal Screening: Efforts in Advocacy, Academia, Research, and Clinical Care)
► Show Figures
13 pages, 2753 KiB
Open AccessArticle